How are the sequences from ‘Pillow Talk’ and ‘Fringe’ different? Discuss the differences in pace and style of editing as well as the effect the editing has on meaning / the audience’ reception of the extracts.
Pillow Talk and Fringe are both edited in completely different ways to make the pace and style different. This is because Pillow Talk is an old film and Fringe is a newer series. It is easily shows during the extracts that Pillow talk was made a lot before Fringe as the style of editing is more complex in Fringe.
Pillow Talk was released in 1959 and was directed by Michael Gordon. The two starring roles are played by Doris Day and Rock Hudson. The simple story line is, a man and a woman share a phone line and dislike each other but then he decides to take her out as another person and they fall in love. It is a typical romance film.
Fringe is an American science fiction series written by J. J. Abrams, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci. The first series started in 2008 and will be starting again in America
The pace in Pillow Talk was very slow as the cuts were slow and the camera was often static. It does not use any special effect but it does use a face and a split screen that wipes across but apart from that it is just simple cuts. This makes the pace very relaxed and calm. The reason for this is the film was made a very long time ago so they may just not have had the technology that we have these days or it could be to put across to the audience that the film its self is very relaxed and a feel good film as its genre is a romance. The way the film is edited does appeal to its target audience. As the target audience was aimed for mainly women in their 20’s or 30’s so they would just want to watch the film with no complicated camera movements. Although, Pillow Talk does have a lot of different camera angles for example it uses, close ups, mid shots, long shots and conversational shots and without these the film would probably be quite boring to watch. Also in Pillow Talk, the only sound you hear is diagetic sound the whole way through the extract.
On the other hand, Fringe has a very fast pace which appeals to the target audience. This is done to make the viewers on the edge of theirs seats while watching. The cuts in Fringe happen a lot quicker than in Pillow Talk which makes the pace seem faster. Also the camera is hardly ever static. It will always be either panning across a room or zooming on to someone or tilting. This, in my opinion makes the extract more enjoyable to watch as it doesn’t get tedious. There is a special effect that shows how modern this film is where the plane is flying and it goes into the parallel universe and camera shakes as the plane disappears. Both the plane disappearing and the camera shaking show how new this program is. Fringe also uses a shot that looks in the reflection of the desk to see the man. You would never appear in a film like Pillow Talk because it is too modern for that type of film. This also uses a variety of camera angles like close ups, mid shots, long shots and conversational shots. But in Fringe there is a bit of non diagetic sound to give the scene more atmospheres.
In basically all ways these extracts are different. The way the camera moves, the editing style and the pace are just the main ones. The main reason the pace is different is because of the length of cuts there many there are. This is why Fringe seems to happen a lot faster. There isn’t a lot of editing in Pillow Talk where as there is in Fringe and lastly the camera movement in Pillow Talk is almost non existing but in Fringe the camera is hardly ever still.
These two extracts are very different in the way it is set out, edited and the audience but they also have some similarities. They both use a lot of different camera angles and both end in a conversational shot which also uses over the shoulder shots this is the most common shot used when two people are having a conversation as the audience can keep up with who’s talking.
To Finish, these two extracts show how different an audience can receive a clip just by the pace being faster and having more editing. Also, the contexts in these films are both very different too which does have an influence on the style of editing. But you can see how some similarities have been used the same for 50 years or more which shows that good camera shots will probably always be used in the world of filming.
No comments:
Post a Comment